Page 38 - Mines and Minerals Reporter eMagazine - Volume October 2021

TECHNOLOGY

during reductive roasting. Vacuum 2019;167:163–74.
[25] Zhao Y, Zhu G, Cheng Z. Thermal analysis and kinetic mod-
eling of manganese oxide ore reduction using biomass straw
as reductant. Hydrometallurgy 2010;105(1-2):96–102.
[26] Rath SS, Rao DS, Mishra BK. A novel approach for reduc-
tion roasting of iron ore slime using cow dung. Int J Miner Pro-
cess 2016;157:216–26.
[27] Wu F, Cao Z, Wang S, Zhong H. Phase transformation of
iron in limonite ore by microwave roasting with addition of al-
kali lignin and its effects on magnetic separation. J Alloy Com-
pd 2017;722:651–61.
[28] Zhao B, Xu X, Li H, Chen Xi, Zeng F. Kinetics evaluation and mogravimetric analysis and reaction kinetics of lignocellulos-
thermal decomposition characteristics of co-pyrolysis of mu- ic biomass pyrolysis. Energy 2020;201:117537. https://doi.
nicipal sewage sludge and hazelnut shell. Bioresour Technol org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117537.
2018;247:21–9. [41] Shen DK, Gu S, Bridgwater AV. Study on the pyrolytic be-
[29] Luo S, Yi C, Zhou Y. Direct reduction of mixed bio- haviour of xylan-based hemicellulose using TG-FTIR and Py-
mass-Fe2O3 briquettes using biomass-generated syngas. Re- GC-FTIR. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2010;87 (2):199–206.
new Energy 2011;36(12):3332–6. [42] Tang Z, Zhang Qi, Sun Y, Gao P, Han Y. Pilot-scale extraction
[30] Ooi TC, Aries E, Ewan BCR, Thompson D, Anderson DR, of iron from flotation tailings via suspension magnetization
Fisher R, et al. The study of sunflower seed husks as a fuel in roasting in a mixture of CO and H2 followed by magnetic sep-
the iron ore sintering process. Miner Eng 2008;21(2):167–77. aration. Resour Conserv Recycl 2021;172:105680. https://doi.
[31] Dey S, Sahu L, Chaurasia B, Nayak B. Prospects of utiliza- org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105680.
tion of waste dumped low-grade limestone for iron making: A [43] Quan C, Gao N, Song Q. Pyrolysis of biomass components
case study. Int J Min Sci Technol 2020;30(3):367–72. in a TGA and a fixedbed reactor: Thermochemical behaviors,
[32] He T, Zhong S, Liu C, Shujaa A, Zhang Bo. Enhancing hydro- kinetics, and product characterization. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis
carbon production via ex-situ catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass 2016;121:84–92.
and high-density polyethylene: Study of synergistic effect and [44] Qu T, Guo W, Shen L, Xiao J, Zhao K. Experimental
aromatics selectivity. Waste Manag 2021;128:189–99. study of biomass pyrolysis based on three major compo-
[33] Zhao H, Li Y, Song Q, Liu S, Ma Li, Shu X. Catalytic reform- nents: hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Ind Eng Chem Res
ing of volatiles from co-pyrolysis of lignite blended with corn 2011;50(18):10424–33.
straw over three iron ores: Effect of iron ore types on the prod- [45] Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of
uct distribution, carbon-deposited iron ore reactivity and its hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007;86(12-
mechanism. Fuel 2021;286:119398. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 13):1781–8.
j.fuel.2020.119398. [46] Chen J, Zhang R, Simmonds T, Hayes PC. Microstruc-
[34] Sun Y, Zhu X, Han Y, Li Y. Green magnetization roasting tural changes and kinetics of reduction of hematite to mag-
technology for refractory iron ore using siderite as a reduc- netite in CO/CO2 gas atmospheres. Metall Mater Trans B
tant. J Clean Prod 2019;206:40–50. 2019;50(6):2612–22.
[35] Zhang Qi, Sun Y, Han Y, Li Y. Pyrolysis behavior of a green [47] Zong P, Jiang Y, Tian Y, Li J, Yuan M, Ji Y, et al. Pyrolysis
and clean reductant for suspension magnetization roasting. J behavior and product distributions of biomass six group com-
Clean Prod 2020;268:122173. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle- ponents: Starch, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, protein and
pro.2020.122173. oil. Energy Convers Manag 2020;216:112777. https://doi.
[36] Patwardhan PR, Dalluge DL, Shanks BH, Brown RC. Distin- org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112777.
guishing primary and secondary reactions of cellulose pyroly- [48] Liu Q, Wang S, Zheng Y, Luo Z, Cen K. Mechanism study
sis. Bioresour Technol 2011;102 (8):5265–9. of wood lignin pyrolysis by using TG-FTIR analysis. J Anal Appl
[37] Ma Z, Chen D, Gu J, Bao B, Zhang Q. Determination of Pyrolysis 2008;82(1):170–7.
pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of palm kernel shell using [49] Huang Y, Wei Z, Qiu Z, Yin X, Wu C. Study on structure and
TGA-FTIR and model-free integral methods. Energy Convers pyrolysis behavior of lignin derived from corncob acid hydroly-
Manag 2015;89:251–9. sis residue. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2012;93:153–9.
[38] Akhtar A, Krepl V, Ivanova T. A combined overview of [50] Zhao C, Jiang E, Chen A. Volatile production from py-
combustion, pyrolysis, and gasification of biomass. Energy Fu- rolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. J Energy Inst
els 2018;32(7):7294–318. 2017;90(6):902–13.
[39] Hosoya T, Kawamoto H, Saka S. Pyrolysis behaviors of [51] Collard F-X, Blin J. A review on pyrolysis of biomass con-
wood and its constituent polymers at gasification tempera- stituents: Mechanisms and composition of the products ob-
ture. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 2007;78 (2):328–36. tained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and
[40] Xiao R, Yang W, Cong X, Dong K, Xu J, Wang D, et al. Ther- lignin. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;38:594–608.

36 MINES & MINERALS REPORTER / OCTOBER 2021