Page 27 - Mines and Minerals Reporter eMagazine - Volume October 2021
P. 27

TECHNOLOGY




            er demand and market forces starkly reduce CO2 emissions.  NITI Aayog (2017). Draft National Energy Policy, Version as on
            Nature Climate Change, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-  27.06.2017  https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/  new_ini-
            00987-x.                                             tiatives/NEP-ID_27.06.2017.pdf [Accessed on July 3, 2021]

            Blinderman, M.S. (2019). Underground Coal Gasification – A  Prusty, B.K., Harpalani, S. and Singh, A.K. (2009). Quantifica-
            New Life for Coal in Asia, Proceedings of the 8th Asian Mining  tion of Ventilation Air Methane and its Utilization Potential
            Congress, MGMI, 33-40. CEA (2018) National Electricity Plan,  at Moonidih Underground Coal Mine, India. In: Proceedings
            January 2018, Central Electricity Authority.         of the 9th International Mine Ventilation Congress. Oxford &
                                                                 IBH, pp. 567-577.
            Garg,  A.,  Shukla,  P.  R.,  Parihar,  S.,  Singh,  U.,  &  Kankal,  B.
            (2017). Cost-effective architecture of carbon capture and stor-  Saraswat,  V.K.,  &  Bansal,  R.,  India’s  Leapfrog  to  Methanol
            age (CCS) grid in India. International Journal of Greenhouse  Economy, NITI Aayog, https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/
            Gas Control, 66, 129-146.                            Indias-Leapfrog-to-Methanol-Economy.pdf [Accessed Feb 15,
                                                                 2020].
            Global Energy Monitor (2021). Boom and Bust 2021 - Tracking
            the global coal plant pipeline, https:// globalenergymonitor.  Sarkar, P., Sahu, S. G., Patange, O. S., Garg, A., Mukherjee, A.,
            org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/  BoomAndBust_2021_fi-  Kumar, M., & Singh, P. K. (2021). Impacts of changes in com-
            nal.pdf [Accessed on July 3, 2021]                   mercial non-coking coal grading system and other coal policies
                                                                 towards estimation of CO2 emission in Indian power sector.
            Hu, B., & Zhai, H. (2017). The cost of carbon capture and stor-  Carbon Management, 12(1), 69-80.
            age for coal-fired power plants in China. International Journal
            of Greenhouse Gas Control, 65, 23-31.]               Singh, A. K. (2019). Better accounting of greenhouse gas emis-
                                                                 sions from Indian coal mining activities—A field perspective.
            Jain, P. K. (2017). Underground Coal Gasification– Experience  Environmental Practice, 21(1), 36-40. Singh, A. K., & Hajra, P.
            of ONGC. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental  N.  (2018).  Coalbed  methane  in  India:  Opportunities,  issues
            Science (Vol. 76, No. 1, p. 012004). IOP Publishing.  and challenges for recovery and utilization. Springer.

            Kelafant, J.R. (2020). CBM Potentiality and Prospects in India.  Singh, A. K., & Kumar, J. (2016). Fugitive methane emissions
            International  Webinar  on  CBM  Resource-  Reserve  Assess-  from  Indian  coal  mining  and  handling  activities:  estimates,
            ment.                                                mitigation  and  opportunities  for  its  utilization  to  generate
                                                                 clean energy. Energy Procedia, 90, 336-348.
            Kholod, N., Evans, M., Pilcher, R. C., Roshchanka, V., Ruiz, F.,
            Coté,  M.,  &  Collings,  R.  (2020).  Global  methane  emissions  Singh, U., & Colosi, L. M. (2019). Water–energy sustainability
            from coal mining to continue growing even with declining coal  synergies and health benefits as means to motivate potable
            production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120489.  reuse  of  coalbed  methane-produced  waters.  Ambio,  48(7),
                                                                 752-768.
            Malik, A., Bertram, C., Despres, J., Emmerling, J., Fujimori, S.,
            Garg,  A.,  ...  &  Vrontisi,  Z.  (2020).  Reducing  stranded  assets  Singh, U., Rao, A. B., & Chandel, M. K. (2017). Economic impli-
            through early action in the Indian power sector. Environmen-  cations of CO2 capture from the existing as well as proposed
            tal Research Letters, 15(9), 094091.                 coal-fired power plants in india under various policy scenari-
                                                                 os. Energy Procedia, 114, 7638-7650.
            McJeon, H., Mignone, B. K., O’Rourke, P., Horowitz, R., Khesh-
            gi, H. S., Clarke, L., ... & Edmonds, J. (2021). Fossil energy de-  Singh, U., Sharma, N., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2016). Environmen-
            ployment  through  midcentury  consistent  with  2°  C  climate  tal life cycle assessment of Indian coal-fired power plants. In-
            stabilization. Energy and Climate Change, 100034.    ternational Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 3(2), 215-
                                                                 225.
            MOEFCC (2021). India: Third Biennial Update Report to the
            United  Nations  Framework  Convention  on  Climate  Change.  Vishwanathan, S. S., & Garg, A. (2020). Energy system trans-
            Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Govern-  formation to meet NDC, 2° C, and well below 2°C targets for
            ment of India.                                       India. Climatic Change, 162, 1877-1891








                                      OCTOBER 2021 / MINES & MINERALS REPORTER         25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32